|
|
|
|
Global
systemic crisis / Phase II
The 4 structural stages of the speeding
up
of the global systemic crisis
Analysis
and decision tools for economical and
political players
|
by
Franck Biancheri
: President of TIESWeb,
President of Newropeans, fellow researcher
at Europe 2020..
|
|
| 16/06/2006 |
|
On the 15th of May 2006, in
GEAB N°5, LEAP /E2020 announced
that phase II of the global
systemic crisis – the
so called « acceleration
phase » [1]-
would start in June 2006 and
that it would be characterised
by a general awareness of the
existence of such a global systemic
crisis.
The strong and ongoing fall
of all stock exchange indicators
all over the planet in the past
weeks clearly shows the start
of this acceleration phase of
the crisis
[2]
, which has now become obvious
to all economical and financial
players.
These players are now seeing
their past reference points
fading and their certitudes
being smashed to pieces. However,
for the LEAP/E2020 team, seeing
the actual starting process
of phase II of the global systemic
crisis [3]
explains its development. LEAP/E2020
has defined 4 structured stages
within this phase II. These
four stages could overlap and
will spread out all along phase
II for a 3 to 6 months period
starting from June 2006. The
way they will link with each
other will determine the nature
of Phase III, the so called
“impact phase”.
LEAP/E2020 has decided to present
two of the four stages in this
public release, these will be
analysed in detail and strategic
and operational recommendations
will be provided in our GlobalEurope
Anticipation Bulletin N°6
to be released on June 15, 2006
[4]:
-
Stage
1 – Fall of world stock
exchanges and temporary liquidation
of dollars
-
Stage 2 – Awareness
of the deadlock of US rates
policy: towards stagflation
or hyper-inflation
-
Stage 3 – Accelerated
flight away from the dollar
and the end of its monopoly
on energy
-
Stage 4 – Emerging of
consequences in the field
of growth and employment
The entry process into phase
II is thus constituted of a
brutal and long-term fall of
the world stock exchange indicators,
which, as stressed already by
LEAP/E2020, had started as soon
as March 2006 with the crash
of the Arab Gulf stock exchanges.
It is important to keep in mind
that a systemic crisis affecting
such a complex and vast system
as the global society at the
beginning of 21st century proceeds
in “waves”, in a
nonlinear way. Thus it affects
certain parts of the system
before others, while suddenly
appearing to reverse its impact
on other components whereas
they are simply transitions,
during which the system reaches
a new threshold of imbalance,
preambling a new impact even
more brutal.
Stage
1 - Fall of the world stock
exchanges and provisional liquidation
in Dollars
Stage 1 illustrates perfectly
this phenomenon. The combined
movements of the Dollar and
of inflation during the last
months have finally changed
the attitudes of the financial
market players, while dispelling
two illusions which underlined
market increases over the past
few years: the solidity of the
US Dollar and the strength of
the American economy (or more
exactly, the negligible character
of its imbalances: uncontrolled
deficits, consumption based
on credit, the real estate bubble,…).
The disappearance of these two
illusions has thrust the stock
exchange operators into an increasingly
opaque and unknown environment,
where only the developments
in interest rates remain understandable
and anticipable [5].
They thus now focus on this
indicator and, in uncertainty,
liquidate all assets whose relationship
with this indicator might seem
to be problematic or negative.
This decision, cumulated with
the consequences of the heavy
losses undergone by the speculators
in the emergent markets (stock
exchange and monetary) [6],
led to a sudden increased demand
for US Dollars, the currency
in which the large majority
of the positions were expressed:
either to fill the losses, or
to escape from positions now
considered dangerous. We are
now witnessing a “technical”
increase of the Dollar which
does not result from a choice
by investors, but which is an
obligatory “transition
stage” within the framework
of a “risk-avoidance”
process, which paradoxically
the Dollar forms part of, and
which can be seen in the long
term decisions of the central
banks of China, Sweden, the
Gulf States or even Russia [7]
to modify their reserves to
the detriment of the Dollar
and for the benefit of the Euro.
Stage
2 - Awareness of the deadlock
in US rates policy: towards
stagflation or hyper-inflation
The financial and stock exchange
players are now focusing on
a single indicator, the evolution
of the interest rates fixed
by the central banks, and in
particular that of the American
Federal Reserve. Indeed, because
of the United States central
role in the world financial
system, they play the part of
the catalyst of hopes and fears;
and their financial authorities
will, during this phase II,
accelerate the crisis. The US
government and Federal Reserve
have indeed led their economy
and the whole of the financial
markets towards a total dead
end. The return of inflation
has led to an increase in interest
rates everywhere in the world,
and the loss of confidence in
the real American economy (with
the background, the general
loss of confidence in the United
States) imposes a dramatic choice
between two solutions with painful
consequences:
-
Solution
1 - towards stagflation:
to raise of the US interest
rate to fight against inflation
and to preserve the credibility
of the Dollar (since it is
only the differential in the
interest rate with the EU
and Japan that now maintains
its relative value), but to
accelerate the collapse of
the growth of the United States
economy, by making the real
estate bubble (which is already
deflating quickly) explode,
and by disrupting up household
consumption (on which the
essence of the US growth has
rested for 5 years). Inflation,
high interest rates and growth
at half-mast, even recession,
this is a well-known situation
which prevailed during the
Seventies: stagflation [ 8].
-
Solution 2 - towards
hyperinflation: stability
of the US interest rates (and
thus a drop of their relative
value compared to the EU and
Japan) to try (without guarantee,
given the current state of
the US economy [ 9])
to maintain the American internal
growth and cause a collapse
of the Dollar whose value
“only just holds”
on this differential, leading
to the brutal interruption
of the financing by the rest
of the world of the American
deficit (commercial and public)
and thus a total financial
crisis. This decision of course
leaves the space open to inflation
by trying to privilege growth,
but it opens a period of generalized
loss of confidence which reinforces,
with the collapse of the Dollar,
a very strong inflationary
pressure in the United States
which could lead to hyperinflation
[ 10].
LEAP/E2020 believes that the
US Reserve Federal, whose shareholders
are large banks [11],
will choose Solution 1 because
in the second case the Federal
Reserve is itself marginalized
and loses the possibility of
using one of its main instruments
of action (interest rates).
In addition, the current president
of the Federal Reserve is convinced
that parallel to a rise of the
interest rates, an additional
contribution of liquidity [12]
to the economy will make it
possible for the latter to set
out again on the path towards
growth [13]
For the team of LEAP/E2020,
neither of the two solutions
open to the American authorities
can cure the total systemic
crisis, their choice will be
in fact primordial in determining
the form and the extent of phase
III of the total systemic crisis,
the phase known as “impact
phase”. The rest of the
world will indeed not be affected
the same way if the American
authorities choose solution
1 or solution 2.
--------------------------------------------------------
1.
Anticipated to last 3 to 6 months
starting June 2006 (cf http://www.europe2020.org/fr/section_global/120506.htm
)
2. Foreseeable
and anticipated for the readers
of the GEAB (cf N°2 to N°5)
3. The
generalized fall of the world
stock exchange
4. In
French version, and other languages
on June 17
5. Stage
3 will illustrate the illusion
also at play with this conviction.
6. Compared
with the beginning of May 2006,
the stock exchange’s losses
go from 15% to 30% depending
on the zones. In most emerging
markets currencies, the loss
reaches 10% to 20%, and in some
of them (Turkey, Korea,…)
has already lead to brutal rises
of the interest rates.
7. Source
Yahoo/Reuters
08/06/2006
8. Stagflation
definition: see Wikipédia
9. The
American government and the
Federal Reserve can even decide,
in electoral year, a fall in
absolute value of the US rates
in order to restart the economic
machine already on the way to
a recession.
10.
Hyperinflation
definition: Wikipedia source
11.
The structure of the Unites
States Federal Reserve is indeed
rather antiquated. It resembles
that of the European central
banks before the 30’s.
It was created in 1913 and is
a de facto bank whose shareholders
are private banks. The future
American Finance Minister, Henry
Paulson, is the former president
of the Goldman Sachs bank which
is itself an important shareholder
of the Federal Reserve of the
United States.
12.
Source:
Reserve Federal - November 2002
- Speech of Ben Bernanke
13.
Stopping the publication
of the M3 indicator (see
GEAB February 2006 issue
) allows for the two operations
to be done simultaneously without
the second, the currency making,
being easily detectable.
Franck Biancheri
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
|
|
|
Special
Files |
|
|
Interviews
|
|
|
News
Headlines |
|
|
Quiz
|
| |
|
| |
|