An artificial exercise,
you tell me, because I am not a Turk!
In part you would be right, but it is
an exercise that I have realized a number
of times in Turkey, as part of several
conferences. With hope of proving wrong
the Turkish proverb "the wise man
does not say what he knows, the buffoon
knows not what he says," the following
is what I would tell my people if I
was a Turkish leader.
The end of 2004 was a huge victory
for our people and our country.
With the agreement from the EU to begin
accession negotiations by the end of
2005, we have finally been recognized
as equals with the Europeans. This decision,
which demonstrates our resolve to continue
to push our country along the road towards
greater democracy, greater human rights,
greater secularism, a market economy,
and greater liberty, is without contest
a historic moment for our people; as
it is for the European Union proving
the universality of its principles and
its refusal to exclude based on religious
or cultural motivations.
Never the less, as on the eve
of all victories, it is essential that
we think about consequences, and the
choices that are now open to us, for
victory is nothing other than a means
of assuring more choices for the future.
Today, Turkey is recognized without
contest as European by its peers in
the EU. Tomorrow what will it be? What
do we want to be, as Turks, always strong
throughout our brilliant history having
forever changed the world?
We
have left the path imposed upon us by
the defeat of the Ottoman Empire, a
path that had reduced us to the role
of being a marginal actor, with its
empire striped, with no perspective
to the East, and to the north because
of the Cold War, confronted with an
unstable Middle East to the South, viewed
as an enemy by our Greek neighbors,
and as a military ally but not a partner
by the Western Europeans.
It
would have taken us several decades
but today with this decision, a decision
that had potentially opened the doors
to the European Union, our country,
our people have definitively escaped
this trap that history had created for
us. The fall of communism open
the doors to the North and to the East;
reconciliation with Greece enabled us
to overcome one of the greatest obstacles
on the road towards the West; and the
brutal change of events currently taking
place in the Middle East, although unpredictable
to date, have left us as one of the
most important powers in the region.
Concurrently, the Iraqi crisis has led
a large number of countries throughout
the world, including our own, to distance
themselves from the United States, creating
a sustainable margin of maneuverability
with respect to our relations with Washington.
The changes in our relations with the
EU are only a small example of the more
vast geopolitical changes that have
taken place in the world over the past
decade. And it is the future of our
country that we must build in the decade
to come. As was the case in 1910/1920,
it is the Turkey's place in the world
for the next century that will be decided
by the decisions that we make from now
until 2010/2020.
As such, we must confront the choice
to join the European Union like the
rest have. We must not let ourselves
be fooled by our imaginations because
the true winner is he who maintains
a purity of thought on the eve of victory.
The path towards the European Union
is long, difficult and filled with potential
pitfalls. We know that their
are powerful political forces that remain
contrary to the idea of our joining
the European Union. We have followed
the rise of xenophobia and extremist
movements throughout the EU and we should
not doubt the influence that this trends
have over the current European leaders.
In one word, the immediate decision
confronting the EU, if it acknowledges
the enormous efforts we have made in
order to put our country on the road
to political modernity, is not a "free
ticket" giving us entry into the
European Union tomorrow. In fact, we
cannot predict whether or not we will
succeed or not in entering the EU one
day; nor can we predict the horizon,
be it 10, 20, 30 years or more.
We owe it to ourselves to be optimistic
but at the same time must acknowledge
that the increasing democratization
of the European Union, which broadens
the role of the people notably by means
of referendum on the most important
European subjects, will lead to referenda
in almost every country in the EU concerning
Turkey's prospective entry. We are thus
confronted with an enormous uncertainty
even if we accomplish those conditions
that the EU has imposed. Furthermore,
this problem will be amplified if the
EU creates a new political vision to
deal with its neighbors, like Russia
and Ukraine. Let’s us not underestimate
the pressure that will be exercised
upon us in order to push us towards
this new neighborhood policy rather
than full membership to the EU. And
let us not ignore a priori the possibility
of a new form of partnership that maybe
less complex and less constraining than
the road to accession. Because
the road to accession is going to be
very difficult and we may try to perpetually
join a European Union that escapes just
as we approach. For this reason, we
should think beginning tomorrow about
some other form of relations with the
EU, similar to others: Norway, Iceland,
Switzerland, or Russia. We should no
longer have an inferiority complex vis-à-vis
the EU, nor should we have a false understanding
of what it really is. As has always
been the case during its glorious history,
the Turkish people and only the Turkish
people, should create the road that
will lead us to a better future. The
EU is now a choice that exists; but
it is not because it is exists that
it is necessarily the best. Only the
future of the negotiations will show
us the truth.
The
conditions for accession will be a central
element in following years for the future
of our country. The European Union has
dictated a set of clear and constraining
rules that we must follow in order to
join. This is reflection of the courageous
decision made recently by the Commission
and soon to be made by the Council.
Our country will be directly affected,
starting in 2005, by the difficulties
of adapting to the EU in all its dimensions
be they economic, political, or social.
We are going to have to adapt
in almost all manners conceivable. And
let this be clear: let us not dream
in vain for the EU to adapt to us. We
are asking to join them, and not the
opposite. They are in control of the
accession process to their club, not
us. The process will be complex
and painful. The examples proffered
by the new Member-States are inspiring.
Especially, as in our case, the EU will
be much less generous. Those funds distributed
during this past enlargement were already
significantly reduced compared to those
of the 80s. But if we choose this path,
I have no doubt that we will succeed.
However,
we will remain wary of attempts at subverting
our people and our national interests
that will remain essential to our people.
As with all things concerning the construction
of the future, we have to maintain an
open mind as to all of the alternatives
in case the path we chose proves to
be insurmountable or if it entails conditions
unacceptable to our national identity.
We want to join the EU to make
us stronger, not to lose ourselves.
And this is why our strategy today has
succeeded, where others until now have
failed. We have significantly strengthened
Turkish democracy, and it is for this
reason that we have received the positive
welcoming from our European brothers.
But democracy is demanding. Let us not
hide the fact that the future will require
us to conform to the democratic model
promoted by the European Union. No power
will escape its democratic control for
long. In one word, by the end
of this decade, our powerful army will
have to confine itself to the defense
of our country, thereby abandoning all
of the positions, without exception,
that it occupies in the civil affairs
of our country. If not, the European
dream will be over.
In
parallel, let us not be naïf, the
evolution of democracy in our country
will lead to freedom of speech, and
a flowering of new ideas as to the future
of our people, that for centuries have
been impossible to imagine. Who
knows what kind of future our children
will wish for when they come of age?
In fine, they will have the final say
in 20 or 30 years.
Other
roads could present themselves. We are
currently recognized as the modern country
that our founding father, Atatürk,
dreamed of. In his time, being
modern was necessarily synonymous with
being European. Today, it is namely
to be European. Who
knows what it will be tomorrow?
In conclusion, I will choose to follow
only those paths that a majority of
the Turkish people wish to follow. Our
current victory, with the opening of
negotiations towards EU accession, is
first and foremost a victory for democracy.
Tomorrow it will be that which our people
decide for it to be; and not that which
is imposed on us by others. Tomorrow
will be judged by our people in function
of our direct interests. The road that
awaits us is open to us. Accession to
the EU is not fate, but a choice. As
with all choices, it will be constantly
reevaluated on our side as well (and
not only by Brussels) in relation to
the results and any new occurrences.
If the road towards accession
is a road that leads to our country
being annexed by Brussels, constraining
our people, forcing our culture to conform
to the culture of Western Europe, then
we must search for another road, one
based on equal relations between equal
partners. Nothing is decided. Everything
remains to be written. But
one thing is certain: this new page
in the glorious history of the Turkish
people will be written by all Turks
together.
Paris,
Franck Biancheri